Back to SOP Resources

    Risk & Control Matrix

    Your comprehensive control framework at a glance

    A consolidated view of all risks and controls across your nonprofit's accounting operations, providing transparency, accountability, and audit readiness.

    Understanding Your Control Environment

    This matrix consolidates all documented risks and their corresponding controls from your 23 Standard Operating Procedures. Each risk/control pair is linked back to the source SOP(s), creating a transparent and traceable control framework.

    Identify Gaps

    Spot areas where controls may be missing or need strengthening across your processes.

    Audit Readiness

    Demonstrate your control environment to auditors with clear documentation and traceability.

    Risk Mitigation

    See which SOPs address each specific risk and ensure comprehensive coverage.

    How to Use This Matrix

    • Search: Find specific risks or controls using the search bar
    • Filter: View risks by category (Financial Reporting, Cash Management, etc.)
    • Navigate: Click on SOP badges to view the full procedure documentation
    • Review: Use the metrics above the table to understand your control coverage
    Showing 118 of 118 risk/control pairs
    118
    Total Risk/Control Pairs
    5
    Risk Categories
    23
    SOPs with Controls
    1.1
    Avg SOPs per Risk
    RiskControlCategoryRelated SOPs
    Delayed responses, audit noncompliance, missed vendor paymentsShared inbox is reviewed daily and categorized by function; all requests have defined response timeframes based on priority level
    Vendor Management
    Duplicate, misclassified, or unpaid invoices; cash flow disruptionInvoices routed promptly and uploaded to payment system with initial coding and review checkpoints
    Vendor Management
    Incomplete, incorrect, or delayed audit responses; reputational and compliance exposureAll audit-related emails are flagged and routed to senior finance staff; supporting documentation is sourced from controlled locations
    Vendor Management
    Missed deadlines or noncompliant filings; impact on program fundingInbox monitoring and direct routing to compliance program process owners with internal backup support
    Vendor Management
    Unaddressed inquiries leading to delays in payments, audit breakdowns, or operational frictionAll unresolved items are logged in a standardized tracker and reviewed daily; aging requests are escalated within 48 hours
    Vendor Management
    Missed or duplicate invoices; vendor service delays or reputational issuesAll invoices received are reviewed daily and logged/uploaded to the AP system with duplicates flagged for removal
    Vendor Management
    Incomplete or incorrect invoice data entry may result in late or over/under paymentsRequired fields are reviewed and invoice images attached before submission for approval
    Vendor Management
    Improper coding can misstate financials and impair grant reportingAll invoice lines are coded to accounting system-integrated fields and reviewed by AP and Finance before sync
    Vendor Management
    Payments made without proper authorization; potential fraud or policy violationsAll invoices require assigned approvers before payment is scheduled; dual approval enforced for high-value or project-specific items
    Vendor Management
    Missed syncs lead to incomplete liability recognition in the general ledgerSync status monitored weekly; AP confirms invoice appears in GL before close
    Vendor Management
    Inconsistent or missing AP data may impact cash flow planning or create missed paymentsAP summary is reconciled to open bills in the AP system and reflected in weekly cash forecast
    Vendor Management
    Carrying forward outdated cash data can distort cash position visibilityFresh copy created weekly using fixed structure; starting balance is pulled from verified bank feed
    Financial Reporting
    Missing open bills can lead to understated cash needs; duplicating invoices may cause overestimationCash flow forecast is reconciled to current accounts payable system open payables weekly
    Financial Reporting
    Inaccurate cash timing may result in overdrafts, missed payments, or loss of funding controlsForecast categorized by payment type and reviewed before payment release each week
    Financial Reporting
    Lack of real-time cash visibility may cause missed obligations or failed paymentsWeekly cash balance check ensures sufficient funds are available before payments proceed
    Financial Reporting
    Uncommunicated changes in cash flow may result in uncoordinated payments or missed issuesFinal cash flow forecast is saved, distributed, and archived weekly
    Financial Reporting
    Misidentifying deposits may result in incorrect revenue classification or missing restricted designationsAll revenue deposits are tied to backup documentation and logged with source attribution before entry
    Financial Reporting
    Improper coding of revenue can distort program financials or violate donor restrictionsRevenue entries are matched to donor records and source documents are tagged with appropriate class/account; Senior Accountant or Controller reviews and approves all entries before posting to the general ledger
    Financial Reporting
    Net deposits without fee breakout may understate income and overstate expensesWeekly payment processor entries are recorded gross, with fees posted separately for transparency
    Financial Reporting
    Misapplied pledge payments can overstate revenue or misalign receivablesPledge receipts are reviewed and matched to customer balances weekly
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect or late time entry may result in inaccurate payroll or grant allocation errorsThe payroll system requires employee submission before approval workflow begins
    Payroll & HR
    Unapproved or improperly approved timesheets could result in unallowable payroll chargesThe payroll system prevents finalization of payroll until all required approvals are complete
    Payroll & HR
    Outdated allocation file leads to incorrect payroll reviews and grant compliance violationsQuarterly review of file accuracy and formal approval process for changes
    Payroll & HR
    Charging inappropriate hours to grants may create audit compliance issuesAllocation review is tied to Master Allocation File and sensitive-time policy review
    Payroll & HR
    Incorrect employee setup may cause payroll errors or misallocation of expensesAll employee changes require documented HR approval before system updates
    Payroll & HR
    Payroll may be processed based on unapproved or incorrect dataCorrections cannot be processed until approval workflow is re-completed
    Payroll & HR
    Incorrect amounts processed may impact employee satisfaction and complianceSystem reports and pre-processing audit are reviewed before submission
    Payroll & HR
    Missing documentation reduces audit readinessAll payroll support is archived immediately after payroll run
    Payroll & HR
    One-off exceptions may bypass standard allocations and cause misreported costsExceptions require Controller review before payroll is finalized
    Payroll & HR
    Incorrect grant reporting may lead to disallowed costs or loss of fundingMonthly review ties spend to approved budget and grant agreement
    Grant Management
    Charging unallowable payroll hours creates compliance exposure and potential repaymentAllocation review compares Master Allocation expectations to timecard activity and grant rules
    Grant Management
    Miscoded expenses may distort reporting or cause billings to be incomplete or inaccurateMonthly reconciliation covers all expense types, not payroll alone
    Grant Management
    Missing or incomplete reconciliation weakens grant reporting and auditsWorkbook ties directly to general ledger, payroll summaries, and allocation file
    Grant Management
    Submitting unsupported or incorrect reports may jeopardize fundingAll reports include general ledger tie-outs, payroll detail, and controlled documentation
    Grant Management
    Improper document storage leads to repeated requests and audit delaysAll grant support is centrally organized and version-controlled
    Grant Management
    Budget errors or omissions may lead to funding shortfalls or rejected proposalsAll grant budgets are based on standardized templates and pulled from verified cost data
    Grant Management
    Misalignment between budget and program scope may cause downstream compliance issuesEach draft is jointly reviewed with program and development staff before submission
    Grant Management
    Submitting unapproved budgets may expose organization to compliance risk or inaccurate reportingNo budget is submitted externally without internal approval from Controller or Finance Director
    Grant Management
    Entry discrepancies between Excel version and system entry may result in funding mismatchBudget entry is cross-checked against approved file and archived with submission evidence
    Grant Management
    Lack of documentation may make it difficult to track assumptions or reconcile future changesEach budget is logged and archived with standardized file structure and naming
    Grant Management
    Inaccurate allocations may result in noncompliant labor charges or audit disallowanceTimekeeping system enforces timecard entry and supervisor sign-off prior to payroll processing
    Grant Management
    Misalignment between timecard data and reported allocations may result in under- or over-reportingAllocation reports are archived and reviewed post-payroll before grant cost application
    Grant Management
    Missing signatures or incomplete timecards may lead to questioned costs during auditSigned timecards are required monthly and stored centrally for all grant-funded staff
    Grant Management
    Variances between documentation sources may indicate incorrect charging or accounting errorsPayroll allocations are reconciled across all documents (timecard, stub, journal entry) each cycle
    Grant Management
    Incomplete or disorganized audit documentation may lead to disallowed costsSupport packets are assembled per grantor specifications and stored in structured folders
    Grant Management
    Invoices processed without appropriate signoff may result in unauthorized disbursements or compliance violationsApproval routing logic is embedded in AP system and verified during entry
    Vendor Management
    Delays in approval may stall payments, damage vendor relationships, or misalign with cash flowWeekly AP review includes aging analysis of unapproved invoices; escalation to Finance Director if needed
    Vendor Management
    Lack of documented approval may result in audit findings or failed internal controlsEvery invoice payment is tied to an AP system approval log or attached manual approval
    Vendor Management
    Payment without final approval exposes organization to legal or reputational riskWeekly payment prep includes final review of approval trail for every invoice
    Vendor Management
    Failure to log or track checks may lead to lost revenue or inaccurate donor recordsEvery physical check is logged, scanned, and backed up electronically upon receipt
    Cash Management
    Misapplied funds may create compliance issues or restricted fund misstatementAll designations are reviewed before deposit; sensitive funds are double-confirmed
    Cash Management
    Deposit errors or system failures may delay fund availability or lose documentationEach mobile deposit is backed by both a physical scan and a digital confirmation archived electronically
    Cash Management
    Unauthorized or undocumented disbursements may violate policy or create audit gapsTreasury payments require documented approval and system-confirmed tracking
    Cash Management
    Gaps between bank records and general ledger may result in missed income or inaccurate reportingAll treasury activity is reconciled monthly and documented in close folder
    Cash Management
    Unverified card syncs may introduce misclassified expenses or compliance issuesTransactions are synced only after full review of coding and receipt documentation
    Financial Reporting
    Missing syncs or timing lags may leave expenses off the books or duplicatedPost-sync reconciliation is performed monthly using system logs and expense reports
    Financial Reporting
    Unclassified or misclassified deposits may distort revenue recognitionEach revenue item is tied to supporting docs and matched to receivables where applicable
    Financial Reporting
    Misclassified or unreviewed bank transactions may misstate program or administrative expensesEvery outgoing payment is manually classified with full context and backup cross-check
    Financial Reporting
    Misaligned records across systems may result in audit flags or financial misstatementsAll synced and classified transactions are reconciled monthly as part of close process
    Financial Reporting
    Errors in payroll journal entries distort program cost reporting and grant allocationsAll payroll journal entries are supported by payroll system reports and reviewed by accounting leadership
    Financial Reporting
    Sensitive or unallowable payroll charges may lead to questioned grant costsAllocation adjustments are documented and approved before the accrual process
    Financial Reporting
    Missing accruals understate expenses and misrepresent restricted vs unrestricted balancesAccrual is recalculated monthly and ties to payroll reports and allocation file
    Financial Reporting
    Misclassification of special payroll items may distort program costs or violate grant restrictionsAll special items must be approved by Controller before posting
    Financial Reporting
    Not reversing accruals causes duplicated expense recognitionAutomated reminder in monthly close checklist ensures reversal is completed
    Financial Reporting
    Unreconciled differences undermine audit support and allocation accuracyMonthly tie-out is required before close is approved
    Financial Reporting
    Delayed retrieval may lead to missed reconciliation deadlinesAll statements are saved by Day 2 of close cycle
    Financial Reporting
    Using outdated GL balance may cause inaccurate variance analysisExport date is always matched to bank statement end date
    Financial Reporting
    Unexplained variances may mask errors or fraudAll differences must be fully explained and documented
    Financial Reporting
    Unsupported reconciling items weaken audit trail and internal controlAll backup is stored with consistent naming in a central location
    Financial Reporting
    Lack of oversight may result in uncorrected errors or stale itemsDual review ensures reconciliations are timely, accurate, and complete
    Financial Reporting
    Failure to record prepaids correctly may overstate current period expensesAll large, multi-month payments are reviewed for deferral at AP entry
    Financial Reporting
    Missing amortization may understate expenses and overstate assetsPrepaid tracker is reviewed monthly and tied to actual journal entry postings
    Financial Reporting
    Overstated or stale prepaid balances may distort net assets or cost allocationsPrepaids are fully reconciled to support schedule each period
    Financial Reporting
    Retaining fully amortized balances may clutter reports or impact analysisClosed prepaids are archived and excluded from active amortization logic
    Financial Reporting
    Missing capitalizable purchases may overstate expenses and understate assetsAP and card reviews include a fixed-asset flag step for large or durable purchases
    Financial Reporting
    Improper reclassifying may misstate capital assets or distort program costsReclass entries are supported by invoices and reviewed by senior accounting staff
    Financial Reporting
    Incomplete register leads to missing depreciation or audit support gapsFixed asset register is updated monthly and reconciled to GL balances
    Financial Reporting
    Missing or incorrect depreciation causes overstatement of assets and misstated expensesDepreciation is calculated from the register and posted monthly with support attached
    Financial Reporting
    Retaining disposed assets inflates asset values and depreciation expensePeriodic review ensures register reflects only active assets and disposals are recorded timely
    Financial Reporting
    Unrecorded leases lead to understated liabilities and noncompliant financial reportingCentral lease register ensures all active leases are documented and tracked
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect initial measurement impacts ongoing lease expense and balance sheet accuracyInitial calculations are performed using standardized templates and reviewed by Controller
    Financial Reporting
    Missing monthly entries misstate liabilities and expensesMonthly close checklist includes lease entry posting tied to lease schedule
    Financial Reporting
    Unreconciled variances may compound over time and cause audit issuesLease accounts are reconciled monthly to controlled schedules
    Financial Reporting
    Unrecorded modifications lead to misstated liabilities and incorrect expense timingAll lease changes require updated schedules and Controller-reviewed journal entries
    Financial Reporting
    Failure to reverse accruals may double-count revenueAccrual reversal is a required first-step close task and tied to original JE reference
    Financial Reporting
    Missing unbilled revenue understates grant income and receivablesGrant spend is reviewed monthly against billing cadence to identify timing gaps
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect accruals may lead to overstated revenue or compliance issuesAccruals are derived from documented spend and reviewed by Controller
    Financial Reporting
    Misstated deferred revenue can misalign revenue with performance obligationsDeferred revenue entries are supported by grant/donor schedules and reconciled monthly
    Financial Reporting
    Misapplied pledge payments may overstate revenue or ARPledge activity is reconciled monthly between donor management system and accounting system
    Financial Reporting
    Missing NPV adjustments can misstate long-term receivables and revenueAnnual NPV review is scheduled and supported by controlled pledge schedule
    Financial Reporting
    Using mismatched report dates can create false variances and delay closeBoth reports are pulled using the identical month-end as of date and stored together
    Financial Reporting
    Unreconciled totals may indicate missing liabilities or duplicate postingsTotal-level tie-out is required before any close signoff
    Financial Reporting
    Vendor-level differences may hide duplicate bills, missing syncs, or coding errorsTargeted vendor tie-out ensures key liabilities are aligned across systems
    Financial Reporting
    Unresolved discrepancies can result in misstated liabilities and audit exceptionsEvery mismatch must be traced to a specific cause and resolved or documented
    Financial Reporting
    Carrying unresolved errors forward compounds GL inaccuraciesErrors are corrected before close; timing items are clearly flagged and tracked
    Financial Reporting
    Closing without AP tie-out may leave liabilities incompleteController review/signoff required prior to financial statement preparation
    Financial Reporting
    Missing platform reports may prevent complete revenue recognition and fee trackingMonthly close checklist requires report downloads and archiving
    Financial Reporting
    Without reconciliation, revenue could be understated (net-only) or duplicatedNet payouts are tied to bank deposits and gross receipts are verified monthly
    Financial Reporting
    Recording net-only deposits understates revenue and obscures fee ratesDeposits are recorded gross with fees separated every month
    Financial Reporting
    Misclassified campaigns may violate donor restrictions or distort project trackingMonthly cross-check ensures campaign metadata matches general ledger coding
    Financial Reporting
    Unreconciled balances may lead to audit exceptions or revenue misstatementController review and stored reconciliation package required before close completion
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect starting balances may cascade into misstated net asset totalsNet asset schedules always begin with a Trial Balance export as of close date
    Financial Reporting
    Misclassification between restricted/unrestricted may violate donor intent and distort reportingRollforward is updated monthly and fully tied to GL balances
    Financial Reporting
    Improper restricted fund treatment can create compliance and audit findingsRestricted activity is reviewed monthly against donor/grant terms and coding
    Financial Reporting
    Missing schedules weaken audit trail and may delay reportingClose checklist identifies required schedules and templates are updated from GL exports
    Financial Reporting
    Unreviewed schedules may carry errors into financial statementsController review and archive required before financial statement reporting begins
    Financial Reporting
    Preparing statements before close completion can result in misstated or incomplete reportingFinancial statements are not generated until close checklist is fully complete
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect report settings may cause missing transactions or misaligned periodsStandard report settings (accrual + month-end cutoff) are used consistently each month
    Financial Reporting
    Undetected errors may pass into leadership reporting and auditsController tie-out review ensures all major balances reconcile to close support
    Financial Reporting
    Lack of variance context reduces usefulness and may lead to misinterpretationMaterial variances are documented monthly with finance leadership review
    Financial Reporting
    Missing key schedules may weaken reporting completenessStandardized monthly package checklist ensures consistent contents
    Financial Reporting
    Distributing unreviewed statements may harm trust and cause decisions based on errorsController approval required prior to any internal or board distribution
    Financial Reporting
    Missed tax credit reporting deadlines may create compliance exposure or investor concernWeekly monitoring of tax credit inbox requests ensures timely awareness and response
    Financial Reporting
    Inaccurate weekly tracking may lead to errors in formal compliance submissionsWeekly tax credit reports are built from verified general ledger and bank activity and archived centrally
    Financial Reporting
    Missing tax credit entries may misstate restricted balances or project costsTax credit journal entry review is a required close step led by tax credit process owner and reviewed by senior accounting
    Financial Reporting
    Missing tax credit documentation can result in audit findings or delayed investor reportingAll tax credit actions are paired with backup evidence stored in structured folders
    Financial Reporting
    Incorrect or late compliance responses may damage program standing or fundingCompliance responses are reviewed by Controller/Finance Director before submission
    Financial Reporting
    Without a deliverables calendar, tax credit deadlines may be missedTax credit tracker/calendar is updated continuously by process owner
    Financial Reporting

    Your Expert

    Kevin Collingsworth

    Kevin Collingsworth

    Partner

    "I'm here to help you customize these controls for your organization's specific needs."

    Need help implementing these SOPs?

    Every organization is unique. Fill out the form below to connect with our team and discuss how to adapt these procedures for your systems.

    Preview form: entries are not sent or stored by this form. Do not enter confidential information.